It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
but he just isn’t a test wicket keeper, you can see he takes balls with stiff arms, and he is just that millisecond too late. I would drop him, but tell him that he is a key part of the England set up and go and prove to us that he shouldn’t be kept out
Foakes yes, he was very unlucky a year or so back.
my swap would be Curran for Archer. He offers more with that bath and in these conditions more with the ball.
Anderson continues to defy logic. Bess has had god know how many drops and stumpings
Pakistan bowlers look good, and batsmen look fun
Leach was criticised for not getting more wickets and getting into the Australians. His series performance:
Four Tests. 101 overs, 20 maidens. 12 wickets. Average of 25.83. Strike rate of 50.8. ER of 3.04. Better average and strike rate than his Australian opponent aka the man acknowledged to be Australia's best ever off spinner.
So far this summer Bess has bowled on some tracks that really have given the spinners a lot for the most part. He hasn't been playing against Australia. He's been playing against Pakistan (very useful batting line up) and the West Indies (mostly shit). Up to the end of today's play, his figures for the summer:
Four Tests (including this current one). 97 overs. 19 maidens. 7 wickets. Average of 46. Strike rate of 83. ER of 3.31.
Yes, he has had chances missed. But overall he's not looked convincing with the ball. And when you stuff the stats down on the page and compare Leach versus Australia where people were doubting him to Bess against what I consider to be weaker opposition and on more helpful pitches for slow bowlers compared to 2019, Bess is on very shaky ground.
"Oh but Bess can bat!" - both have one Test half century.
"Oh but Bess can field better!" - Leach has held more catches. Both have effected run outs.
We shouldn't be picking spinners based on their ability to make up for a misfiring batting top order.
Archer's had some criticism and I think it's unfair. He just looks like a guy who had a really niggly injury at the start of the year, the sort of injury that can cause a drop in pace (remember Tim Bresnan pre- and post- elbow injury?). He looks really undercooked. You can come back from an injury and do as much net bowling as you like but it's not actual match practice. I'd say Anderson's a bit similar too.
If Bess's bowling is defended by saying he bats and fields a bit better (debatable on the second), then his bowling isn't good enough this season despite playing on helpful wickets. Bottom line: his record this summer is mediocre compared to the record of the 1st pick spinner last summer.
Test cricket - you can't beat it!
Not that we'd have cared because we'd all be attending Hundred matches, right?
Following the last win, then Butler + Woakes will certainly remain in place
The issue for me will Archer or Anderson be replaced for the next match - IMO Curran should be in there - As a bowler as he offers something different, certainly as the 4th seamer in that 'all rounder' role and is often useful with the bat
So for me
Burns
Sibley
Crawley
Root - at 4
Pope
Butler
Curran
Woakes
Bess
Broad
Archer or Anderson - choice of sentiment or hopefully the future
Foakes must be in the bubble, otherwise he would have been playing for his county.
At times his footwork has reminded me of the great Jason Leonard.
*An Official Foo-Approved guitarist since Sept 2023.