It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I'll have to take a look at Jason Sadites - thanks for the tip @sgosden
For Fendery tones I stick with the stock cabs.
For drive stuff I use Celestion's own IR of the G12-65 mixed with a Marco Fanton Mesa IR that came with one of his patches.
For bass I don't use cabs at all. I have a selection of EQ curves instead.
I’m so bored I might as well be listening to Pink Floyd
I sound like a bit of a shill for York but really just trying to share as they simplified the IR process a lot for me, I don't really like Ownhammer etc as there are way too many choices for me. With YA he doesn't use the same positions and signal chain for every cab, rather using what he thinks works best for that particular cab and speaker so you don't get a million choices with cryptic filenames. Mix 01 is usually a nice balanced 57/121 blend which I find a great starting point.
The archon is ok.
Placater is brilliant.
Its likely to do with how their modelling procedure / software has improved since the early amp versions.
Anyway, sorry to hear about your troubles @chrishill901 . I am not a heavy rock player but from what I've read on various websites (so it's all second hand knowledge) possible solutions to get to grips with the higher gain amps would be (1) lower the sag setting, (2) apply a massive low-cut in front of the amp and an equally massive low boost after it or (3) run the master very low and add a gain block after the amp to compensate for the volume loss. All three solutions seem to be based on the idea that the simulated power amp flubs out if you work it too hard.
Sorry if all that is too obvious - so difficult to judge without any context whether such comments are vaguely helpful or likely to waste the recipient's time.
The last thing I did was for what ever cab or IR I’m using I googled the frequency range of the speakers in that cab/IR and I set the high and low cuts of the cab/IR to that frequency range. To my mind that means the cab/IR is reproducing the frequency range that speaker would produce in real life.
Give it a go and see what you think
oooh and update to the latest firmware if you haven’t already so you get the benefit of the oversampling update. There is a lot of debate about the difference this actually makes but to my ears it was a definite improvement.
I know that it isn't going to be exactly the same, IR has a mic involved, stage cab doesn't etc etc but they are a very good match for each other.
Rhett Shull’s video may give you some helpful tips, of how to get a more amp in the room tone.
https://youtu.be/J02heFTwEXY
1. Currently I have a powerful MIDI controller that I plan to keep and use to control the Helix. I'll continue to use it to control other devices so don't plan on using Helix as my "prime" for MIDI. Ignoring the nice scribble strips and colours around the switches am I likely to lose anything by not buying the controller? Not bothered about configuring Helix on the fly with my feet either
The cost of the Helix controller is not an issue, it's more from what I've read so far I don't think that it gets me anything I can't do with my existing controller.
2. My MIDI controller has 10 switches (plus bank up/down), I have the top 5 configured in a "global stomp" mode which means they have the same function on all banks and control a TC Nova Drive and G-Major 2 (they also control a Line6 POD at the same time, but let's not complicate it too much here
The bottom row of 5 typically call a preset and change amplifer accordingly. A second press pulls up an alternative configuration, e.g. turn off a pedal compressor, turn on a drive pedal and, the delay on the g-major.
Each "patch (trying not to use the preset word here too)" on the TC is configured to have everything (apart from reverb) off and the MIDI controller determines what gets turned on on the G-maj with a bunch of CC messages.
My main bank has
1: clean sound with a stomp box compressor, chorus and delay enabled,
2: clean sound with a stomp box compressor by themselves
3: Cruncny Marshll by itself
4: Marshall with a the TC Drive switched on
5: is a "stomp" that adds a Neo ventilator2 rotary
On all the main 4 I can independently turn on / off the "global" stomps and the secondary setting does that as well.
So I think that this is fairly similar to what snapshot achieves... set up a preset and the snapshot varies which of the blocks available in the preset are active. So far so good.
What I can't seem to properly determine is whether within a snapshot I'd be able to dedicate footswitches to toggle individual blocks on and off in the same manner as I do today.
thanks in advance folks
I have my 3 x Stomp footswitches set for Snapshots, then on my MC6 I have switches for the individual blocks in the snapshots, so reverb on/off, delay on/off etc.
The only downside (unless I’ve just not got it configured properly) is that while you’re still in that preset, the Stomp remembers the changes you’ve made. So if you turn off reverb in snapshot 2 and then you went back your snapshot one, the reverb is still off in snapshot 2. This will stay this way until you either turn it back on, or move away from the preset and back into it.
I’ve sometimes been caught out in a live situation with this, when changing stuff on the fly