It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
You heard it here first.
soundcloud.com/thecolourbox-1
youtube.com/@TheColourboxMusic
Apparently, they had a disagreement over the transfer budget, or the away strip, or who sat where on the coach, or something.
Maybe Tony's Lopetuegui out joke will come to pass of Lopetegui's own Bolton just before the season starts if a better offer comes in!
soundcloud.com/thecolourbox-1
youtube.com/@TheColourboxMusic
What a result though , I know it’s not the Man U of old but we owe them a few spankings and seeing Olise in particular playing like he’s over the park was brilliant . If we had peak Wilf in this team we’d be good enough for Europe !
I know Man U have injury issues but that team look like the can't wait to go on a summer holiday - Lack of interest, style, commitment
I bet effort levels increase for the FA Cup. If against the odds we actually win that I hope it doesn't paper over any cracks.
Easy to pick on the little guys innit.
My head said brake, but my heart cried never.
However being Palace fans we are always expecting the wheels to come off at some point so keeping my feet on the ground at the moment. That said, Glasner should get manager of the month without question.
I've said it before - The Man City and indeed Chelsea case is massively different - They have not exactly broken PSR rules - But this is more today with exploitation and evasion - Not to similar to tax evasion - To many channels to hunt down to effectively see where they have achieved this - Be it the over 'sponsorship' of the stadium by Etihad in order to inflate funds income - As we know Etihad and Sheikh Mansour are one and the same - Add to that many 'reports' of additional funds paid to Pep, agents etc coming direct from Abu Dhabi in order to keep the main Man City account within the appropriate threshold - But looks like it is hard to prove such facts - They are just boxing more clever, with appropriate lawyers and accountants, than the PL can defend with
With potential changes to kick in, ready for the 2025 season - Based on a spending cap - https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/13125832/premier-league-spending-cap-rules-explained-what-might-clubs-be-allowed-to-spend-from-the-2025-26-season - Interesting that Man City voted against this - I'm not sure why, as currently they just exploit any rules, so can easily do the same again