It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Cheers.
soundcloud.com/thecolourbox-1
youtube.com/@TheColourboxMusic
Bundesliga - what a boring league. Bayern Munich just won for a 10th consecutive year. And I thought the Scottish league was dull!
Howe has done a great job with the resources at his disposal.
The £100m was spent on Trippier, Guimaraes, and Wood.
Trippier has been injured and has barely played. Guimaraes didn't start for over a month, and was getting five, six, seven mins as a sub. There were headlines in the press about his frustration at lack of game time. Wood is a signing that everyone mocked.
Howe has done an absolutely remarkable job no matter how you cut it. Newcastle didnt win in their first ten games, but since January they've outperformed everyone in the league except Liverpool. Suddenly that £100m (and its caveats as above) to do better than City, Chelsea, Man Utd, Arsenal, Spurs, etc. seems like a very small number indeed.
TBH all leagues are doing it. There's a small number of moneybags clubs hoovering up the trophies.
soundcloud.com/thecolourbox-1
youtube.com/@TheColourboxMusic
So while I do agree that at the moment it really is between Man City, Liverpool and Chelsea, I do think there's a lot of competition generally, and now Newcastle will be up there too.
There's obviously issues with the likes of Chelsea, City, Newcastle and how they get their money, but I do think there's a lot of competitiveness in the EPL and teams have periods of dominance and those teams change regularly.
Scottish football is really competitive outside the top two. But "hur hur, two horse race" is whats used to deride the Scottish game by people who seem to have failed to spot exactly the same thing happening in England. So England's closed shop at the top absolutely needs to be seen in the same light. The fact that finishing "top four" is a major goal for so many is a laughable indictment of how much English fans have drunk the Sky-supplied Kool Aid rather than a measure of an exciting setup. Remember when winning things was the aim?
The only real difference between Aberdeen fans and Spurs fans is that Aberdeen fans have no delusions about their chances. Oh, and they don't have to pay £1500 for a season ticket to see their team win nothing.
Borrowed from elsewhere:
In the 80s there were thirteen different clubs in England who won major trophies. This included Wimbledon, Luton, Oxford, Coventry, Norwich, Wolves, Forest. The 90s saw 12 different winners, including the likes of Villa, Leeds, Sheffield Wednesday, Leicester. By the 2000s it's down to 9 winners, but you've still got Spurs, Portsmouth, Blackburn etc getting their hands on trophies.
In the last decade only four trophies in English football have been won by clubs outwith what we could call "England's Old Firm". Leicester have won two, Wigan, and Swansea.
That's four trophies out of the last thirty going to the same closed shop. They're fucked too. People laugh at Spurs, for example, for not winning anything. But they're up against a closed shop. Trophies now are basically only won by a tiny group of clubs and that's just the way it's going.
In Scotland 9 of the last 30 trophies have been won by clubs outwith Celtic and Rangers, so you could argue that in a way a Hearts, Aberdeen, St Mirren, or Ross County fan is better off than an Everton or Aston Villa fan. We're all in the same boat in that our teams won't win the league, but we've got a better chance of maybe winning a cup.
I reckon they'll try and sign Rice as a statement signing.