It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I simply cannot understand the attraction of wanting a dog like a BXL…or dobermans, staffies, German shepherds etc.
I dunno, I'm just thinking out loud, it scares me too. Anywhere I am, I always check out my environment to look for escape routes, or look for anything discarded (a bottle in a Park) or anything in the vicinity that can be used as a weapon (brick or large stone). There may not be anything but it's just a case of being alert.
Failing that, I will use any means necessary with my own body to subdue or kill a dog that is threatening my life.
Hitting it and screaming at it does nothing.
I love dogs, but not the untrained ones.
Then charge them with animal cruelty with an on-the-spot fine of, say, £500 per animal.
Once the Dog attacks, it is dead one way or another. If I had hold of it's back legs after releasing it from a Child's face, I'd be swinging that Dog's head into the nearest hard, flat surface with no remorse.
The important thing is the leg lift. I’ve seen it work firsthand in a dog fight. Most people aren’t aware of it.
I had no idea about that.
There is a world of difference between a Bully - an American Bulldog, and an XL Bully, they're two completely different breeds with vastly different physical characteristics and behavioral traits. Not to mention that one of them, the American Bulldog, is a well established recognised breed with internationally recognised physical characteristics and behavioral traits, and the other isn't and doesn't have any internationally recognised physical characteristics and behavioral traits. Right now as it stands, two Bully XL dogs from different litters can be and have vastly different physical characteristics, behavioral traits, and genetic makeup, with the only thing they have in common being ''they look very similar to each other'' to the average person on the street, and yet they will be classed as the same breed. It will just be like the early 90's again when perfectly innocent dogs will be destroyed for the crime of having a passing resemblance to a banned breed, hence why the Dangerous Dogs Act of 1991 was dramatically relaxed back in 1997 and even by then the American Pit Bull Terrier wasn't an official recognised breed with defined physical characteristics and behavioral traits, that didn't happen until the early 2000's around 10 years after the Dangerous Dogs Act was first introduced and close to 5 years after these laws where dramatically relaxed after all, all it took to have a dog destroyed was for somebody to say that a dog in public looked like a banned breed and it would be confiscated and destroyed - it's a very different process that involves the courts if the dog is on private property if it's reported the court has to give permission for the dog to be destroyed it doesn't just happen automatically like it would if it was on public property so there is the burden of evidence and proof before the dog can be destroyed.
The "ban the breed" people aren't realistic.
The "there's no such thing as a dangerous breed, just dangerous owners" people are fantasists.
No idea how you fix the problem.
Within a few years, the problem goes away by itself, and you also fix the problem of irresponsible breeding, which is a much more important issue for the "deed not breed" crowd (which, admittedly, I'm part of), so there's something in it for everyone who matters.
None of that will grab headlines and votes like "WE'RE SAVING THE CHILDREN BY BANNING THESE DEMON DOGS!", though.
I'm getting a Komodo Dragon on a lead