It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
It's all original and I'm loathe to mess with the frets. Losing the nibs is a big deal to some people and I do have an eye on the value of it as something to pass down to the kids one day. It would no doubt would get more use if I got it refretted, but I have two other Les Pauls with modern frets if I need to do big bends on an LP.
Bit of pointless musing for you there OP. In answer to your question, I think a range of £2.5k - £4k is reasonable depending on condition, originality, colour etc.
LPC feels slicker, refined but powerful.
R9 feels raw, louder shoutier.
which one would I grab in a house fire…
Both.
I recall such a scenario a number of years ago, with a local customer - He now owned a number of nice guitars, but he still had strong feelings for his late 70's LP Custom - Apparently I sold it to him in 1978 - But he just hated the whole feel/playability, compared to other guitars - But as it was his first pro-grade guitar he was sentimentally attached to it - But it just sat in its case these days
After finally listening to me, many months later, he had it re-fretted - He now thanks me for putting life back into his old fav - It has come back to be his #1 again
Even with top end vintage pieces from the 50's and 60's 'golden era' then only a few would ever object to a good re-fret - But all will object to worn, small, crap and knackered frets
Again I've only known a few players/customers ever go down the route of wanting a re-fret on a Gibson and keep the nibs - I'm sure techs like @FelineGuitars and @SteveRobinson etc will pass additional comment on this - Personally I prefer the frets over the binding with no nibs - Think JoBo does as well
With regards to pots, even saddles and tuners it can depend on how 'workable' they are - Original pots, that are scratchy and worn are neither use nor ornament - But I would accept that it might have an impact on value - Depends on rarity/vintage/collectability - even with a Gibson this can have a negligible impact - ie a new loom with 500K good pots is more desirable, to many, than an original loom with 300k pots, especially if worn/scratchy - This can also depend on how good. player it is
Ref a good refret to such a guitar - I think if you check out this forum and other forums, be it LP/Gibson, or others it is a bit of a debate about any impact to the value - But to most players, worn frets and a poor player are a turn off - I've known, or heard before, of a potential buyer to such a guitar like yours, asking for a discount, to cover the cost of a good refret - I'm sure other FB members will throw in their 10 Kenneth about this topic - Create a fresh topic if you like - But a) a regret will improve how your guitar feels/plays and that is almost 100% set in stone and b) the re-fret will have no impact on the value on such a guitar
Personal opinion here
We get players who spend say £365+ on a refret, but then play that guitar for an hour a day every day for the next year
Sorry for further sidelining the OP's thread
Many guitars have a re-sale value. Some you'll never want to sell.
Stockist of: Earvana & Graphtech nuts, Faber Tonepros & Gotoh hardware, Fatcat bridges. Highwood Saddles.
Pickups from BKP, Oil City & Monty's pickups.
Expert guitar repairs and upgrades - fretwork our speciality! www.felineguitars.com. Facebook too!
https://www.bigfoot-guitars.de/portfolio-items/1974-gibson-les-paul-custom-20th-anniversary/?portfolioCats=92