It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Offset "(Emp) - a little heavy on the hyperbole."
Question for both sides. Does your own financial situation affect how you might vote?
I.e., can you still afford mortgage payments if the interest rates go up? Can you take some financial risk and uncertainty?
Just a thought, but if you bought your first house in the last 10 years or so you may be less inclined to rock the boat due to not having much scope to ride out any economic wobbles, even if leaving would be best in the mid to long term.
Many of the leave voters I see around where I live are older, bought their houses years ago and are sat on good equity. Baby boomers voting out with no mortgage and masses of savings from great pensions etc. Then there's a younger demographic, who are completely frozen out of the housing market due to current house prices and need to affect a change, because any chance of changing the equilibrium could increase opportunity.
This is very simple, spend 10 minutes looking up the Aims of the EU and the Purpose of the EU and see if they align with what you want for this country.
here are the main aims:
The European Union has four main aims:
- To establish European citizenship. This means protection of
fundamental human rights and freedoms.
- To ensure freedom, security
and justice. This means co-operation in the field of justice and home
affairs.
- To promote economic and
social progress. This involves the single market, the euro, environmental protection and social and regional
development.
- To assert Europe's role in the world.
The first one is the one that made me change my vote, Definition of citizenship is :Citizenship is the status of a person recognized under the custom or law as being a member of a country.It is clear that the EU is moving towards a "USA" system where the countries will become states, rather than countries. I don't have an issue with this per se, but we don't have the cultural homogeneity that they have in the USA.
Trading feedback: http://www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/72424/
Any change is risk, might end up being an opportunity, but in the short term there will be uncertainty which is not good for financial markets, interest rates, cost of living etc. It is a gamble and unknown. If you are at the peak of your expenses in life (Young children, relatively big mostly unpaid mortgage), it is a bigger risk than if you are financially set in life and want better return for your investments.
My point is the gamble might pay off but if you are not in a position with sufficient funds to ride through the initial uncertainty, it may be a consideration in your thinking.
I think you've answered my question
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
In the broader sense yes, always. In the specifics, if that change is interest rates go up 5% and you can't afford your mortgage you probably don't want that kind of change. If you have money to invest that would be good change.
Perhaps you could argue in any step for positive change, somebody somewhere will feel some pain and it is part of the process.
He who dares wins, as they say.