I don't really want to start another the right or wrongs of Chappers thread but as I have said for lack of better to do over a long Christmas shutdown I ended up following the Rob Chapman video accusations and counter-accusations as much as anything out of a morbid curiosity and also how a business success story goes so wrong.
What I have found more interesting is because I watched the three or four going on over the December/Jan Period I am now getting endless other commentaries and follow up from Video Channels I have neither liked followed or whatever so effectively auto-generated by some google algorithm that feeds me more of the same.
So I suppose the real question is if you fall from grace on social media does the machine then consume you and it becomes the death of a thousand cuts as more and more people hear the negativity about you and does regardless of right or wrong that weight of negative information becomes fact.
Just interested as I got 4 new videos on the subject last night rehashing most of the old stuff
Comments
I bet the overall profit on a Chapman sold at Andertons is incredibly high considering. Probably a single cheap guitar sale nets them more than a couple of Fender Cs sales.
News of their demise seems to be greatly exaggerated. By pricks on youtube.
Been uploading old tracks I recorded ages ago and hopefully some new noodles here.
Some of these backlash videos are pretty nasty, personal and must have taken hours and hours to produce.
I am not a fan of most online guitar sales people, apart from the odd few or those that seem genuinely awesome. E.g. Andy ex PGS.
Probably the same algorithm that pops that crap ad up for me.
I have mixed opinions about Chapman - the man and the guitars.
People become famous (for whatever reason), become popular, then other people start scrutinising them and looking for a story to generate interest/clicks/views/money.
Traditional media doesn't cover online personas much (yet), so the backlash happens on the platform where the person is known.
All this will be analysed in 30 years with great interest.
The guitars were already in Guitar Center before this all blew up. If sales drop by a significant level, there is a risk of them dropping the line. Assessing the scale of that risk is subjective, but it's real nonetheless.
It's still early days to work out whether this has truly damaged Chapman or not. It's not something that will happen overnight. As was pointed out in the video that set this ball rolling, they owe half a million quid, and are owed £300k. The books do balance because they have some cash in the bank but if the creditors get jittery it could go sour very quickly.
Finally, I'd be interested to hear from someone like @guitars4you what a rough profit margin on a CS Fender is. However common sense dictates there is considerably more profit in two sales of £3000 than there is in one sale of £500.
I was surprised at the people making videos about him though. It’s almost like when the media like red top newspapers turn on people but you expect that sort of behaviour from them.
It does seem like a blatant way to ride the coat tails of someone’s unpopularity for views and likes
and just seems like a lot of girly whinging and backbiting but even more boring .
I will miss the chappers and captain buffoonery if it is no more.
They wouldn't even dream of acting like that to anyone in person but in their car they feel safe and that the person will never find out who they are.
Same idea with the internet, I doubt many would be so hateful of someone in person but cowards find safety in anonymity.
As for the rest it is pure speculation. Guitar Center caters to a huge market of people who don't know what they want to buy and who certainly don't give a shit about people in their basement bad mouthing someone else.
Is there any evidence behind the idea of downvotes ever being the cause of lost sales? Look how many people still buy Vertex and have no idea of his various frauds. Let alone the ones who do know but don;t give a toss.
Not everyone pays attention to silly people shouting on the internet. Likewise everyone is still buying Gibson.
Been uploading old tracks I recorded ages ago and hopefully some new noodles here.
That's the only way to explain it.
(Or so everyone says).
Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com
Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com
Me: https://www.jamesrichmond.com
They don't own the manufacturing facility, and there is no distribution. Chapman Guitars is basically a drop-shipping operation. They pass on their orders to the manufacturer, who delivers directly to the customer. Their headstock design is moderately distinctive, otherwise the guitars are standard fare, with very similar models available from any number of manufacturers, often made in the same factory.
The only value they add is the name "Chapman" on the headstock, and perhaps endorsements (although the only endorsee I can name that doesn't actually own the company, Rabea, is Chappers' mate, not a value-adding endorsee in the conventional sense). At the risk of repeating myself, if the Chapman name becomes a negative value prospect, their business will suffer. I don't believe this to be a particularly controversial statement.
Chapman was the first "internet guitar brand" that I'm aware of - the popularity of the brand was directly linked to his online persona and the Chapman forum where the collaborative design happened. Bearing that in mind, I really cannot agree that what happens on the internet has no effect on the business.
Been uploading old tracks I recorded ages ago and hopefully some new noodles here.