It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
At least I think that’s what she said
My Trading Feedback | You Bring The Band
Just because you're paranoid, don't mean they're not after youGrass!!
is it crazy how saying sentences backwards creates backwards sentences saying how crazy it is?
My Trading Feedback | You Bring The Band
Just because you're paranoid, don't mean they're not after youPS: Plenty of over priced kit on here as well.
Pretty sure this cab barely sold for £200 a few weeks back. Regular Jackson cabs sell for around £150..
I've just offered him a bag of pasta as a trade.
Bought from an American friend who had it from new and brought it over from California. He worked at film studios there hence the Batman cover!
And the £999 description:
This cab was brought to London from Los Angeles years ago by a set designer who worked on the early Batman films where this apparently was used as a prop on set. This person also worked in Jim Henson's prop shop and came to London to work on one of his projects, bringing this cab with him.
Of course, all of that new information could very well have come about from conversation. The work at Jim Henson's prop shop does nothing to the value of the cab but makes it for nice feel-good-provenance-hot-cocoa-sipping-comforting-goodness.
The middle bit, where 'this apparently was used as a prop on set' is the what hikes it up £950, and if it's true it is legitimately more valuable than your run-of-the-mill Jackson cabs. The problem is this 'apparently'. Either it was used or it was not used. If there is provenance, a screen-cap of the scene where it's used or other evidence, then it fair enough, otherwise it's just a lie used to increase perceived value.
Edited to reflect @HarrySeven 's point