It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Especially in that other place.....
I don't see how you can seperate the man from the music. After all....it is music that we are discussing. A form of communication.
If you have a look at the guys who are considered the world's greatest pianists (of all time), I would suggest to you that the candidates are all of similar technical ability. Achieving those levels for a musician requires hard work but is not in any way impossible or unusual - as a million YouTube guitarists can demonstrate.
So the factor which sets aside the worlds greatest pianists (and surely Guitarists...?) is their ability to communicate emotion...
The only people in this thread who don't like the Smiths and have been positive have said he is a good guitarist or a competent guitarist, which would be in line with my thinking - in fact I was the most positive when I said he was a great guitarist, which I think pretty much for the reasons the fans give - good sound, individual, pleasing arrangements, etc
I have wondered whether starting this thread has been quite as jolly an idea as I'd hoped, and I don't think I'm wrong in detecting hackles raised. Is it really such heresy to ask such a question?
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
I too asked to be educated about JM, so I asked for some clips of his best work. So far, not much has been forthcoming. Is that because you have to like the Smiths to 'get' him? I don't like the Smiths, clarification I don't like Morriseys voice, a lot like Leonard Cohen with a band, music to cut your wrists to, but take away or substitute the singer and the songs would be very different, maybe. But...... give me a song with a good guitar part no matter what style or genre and I'll have a listen.
JM isn't going out to be flash Harry here. He's just doing what a lot of us have been telling you about, that is providing a perfect (and to most, unique) accompaniment. You'll more than likely hate it, which I can understand, but for those of us who dig the old Manchester scene and Indie in general, it's musical heaven. Perhaps we're just musically challenged compared to your good self? If that's what the naysayers believe then I'm cool with that.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
But yes not by far the twattiest stage name out there.
Mid 80s. Nothing to be impressed about though :-)
Mid 80s. Nothing to be impressed about though :-)
[/quote]
You're kidding me! Well I am impressed!
I don't think you're musically challenged, probably that you just haven't put your favourite music in perspective so you are defending your favourite music, thats fine, we all do it. A mate of mine keeps arguing that Richard Thompson is the best British guitarist, but thats because he is really into folk music. It take many many years to revisit the music of your youth, your formative years, and critically analyse it from a distance in time.
When I was growing up I listened to Jimi, The (Small) Faces, Quo, Rory, The Rolling Stones, Deep Purple, The Beatles, Bowie, Free, Black Sabbath, Led Zep, Bad Co, along with Barclay James Harvest, Roxy Music, Wild Turkey (Bernie Marsdens first band), Yes (sold the Yes Album two weeks after having bought it) etc etc. And bear in mind these bands were churning out brand new fresh ideas that had never been heard before. We would all argue like heck about who was the best guitarist, singer, band. None of it means anything now of course, because ten years later i started listening to early Gary Moore, Fleetwood Mac, SRV, Whitesnake, Dio, UFO, etc etc. It puts things into perspective a bit for me.
So in that first list, we have Jimi Hendrix, Ronny Wood, Stevie Marriott, Francis Rossi, Rory Gallagher, Mick Taylor, Keef, Richie Blackmore, John Lennon, George Harrison, Mick Ronson, Paul Kossoff, Tony Iommi, Jimmy Page, Mick Ralphs, etc etc..One heck of a list I think you'd agree. Does JM have that sort of competition in his era? No.
So, for the band(s) that has the most enduring appeal for me Free (then Bad Co) would I argue that Mick Ralphs deserves to be on a list of the best 25 British guitarists? Well I probably would have back in the day, but not now. Top 100 definitely. But would I put his predecessor in there? Most assuredly, he was and still is iconic in a way that Ralphs isn't. Would I put JM above Ralphs, no, but some people with a more time limited experience would even put JM above Koss in any (however pointless) list, because it depends who or how you ask the question.
So just because a guitar player happens to be in your favourite band, a band with some critical success and a lot of followers, it doesn't follow ipso facto, that he is one of the best guitarists ever. If you narrow the question to is he the best of his era? possibly. If you ask is he the best guitarist in the Smiths, quite probably. Though lets all remember what John Lennon said when Ringo was asked what its like to be the best drummer in the world. 'He's not even the best drummer in the Beatles'.