It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Remember, it's easier to criticise than create!
Remember, it's easier to criticise than create!
Whatever level of political correctness causes someone to condemn him - clearly nothing he had done is as morally reprehensible as Savile's actions.
I read an article over the weekend which Clarkson wrote for the Sunday Times about his mother, who died in August of last year. It was a highly affecting piece of journalism - referencing what was in effect the dismantling of his childhood as he went through what was left of her things (she had known she was dying for many months and had had a major clear-out for the benefit of her children). It was imbued with warmth and equal measures of pathos. Not the work of an uncaring man...
It is clear that behind the persona, this loss has affected him deeply. I was not especially close to my own mother - but her loss rendered me an orphan, shortly before my 40th birthday. I didn't expect it would hit me so hard - but it did....
Perhaps the best thing that can happen to Clarkson is that he has time to come to terms with his loss. Being middle-aged does not make these things easier to bear.
Wiz awarded.
Writing this whilst listening to In Our Time which is one of the best series on. Most of the time its about some topic you don't give a stuff about, but Bragg is a very good interrogator.
The BBC asked the Hamster and Captain Slow to front the last three shows without Clarkson and they said no so I think their time is up as well.
Remember, it's easier to criticise than create!
I'm fairly apolitical - I'm a Tory on financial issues but far more to the left on social issues - so I disagree with Clarkson on some things. But I also disagree with most of the ranting left-wing comics who get lots of airtime.
It seems to me that the left-wing view is always judged morally 'right' - and certainly on things like discrimination it clearly is, while a right-wing view is always deemed as morally 'wrong'. This seems fundamental in the the vilification of Clarkson.